Tracfone offers SafeLink in New Hampshire

Tracfone announced that the would cover an additional 101,000 households in New Hampshire. SafeLink provides a free cell phone and 80 minutes per month to low-income individuals. As we learned as part of a study last year, access to cellular phones can increase one’s earning potential. However, SafeLink isn’t completely welcome everywhere. In article in The Republican, a newspaper in Massachusetts, notes that just 39 percent of eligible people have taken advantage of SafeLink. That doesn’t mean that people don’t want it. Rather, it more likely means they are not aware. The Repubican article, while seemingly critical, follows the story of Edward Collins, a 48-year-old Massachusetts resident who has taken advantage of the program. He sees this as a temporary boon, something he can use to get on his feet while he trains for an information technology job. This is a perfect example of SafeLink’s aim. Detractors, however, note that the subsidy for these free phones come from taxpayers. State Rep. Donald F. HUmanson Jr. said, “We are having everybody else pay a fee to provide cell phones to other people.” Worse, Massachusetts residents paid in roughly $115 million more into the program, in the form of the Universal Service Fund, than they received back. That, however, misunderstands the USF. The USF is more than providing service to those in need. It also helps build out rural networks, which larger, profit-minded carriers won’t touch because of the cost of operation vs. expected revenue. While cell phone users might resent paying a tax for the purpose of serving others, it is still necessary to serve the whole country, not just select parts. While the gripes are noted, and they are certainly legitimate, the benefits are real. Rural areas need cellular coverage, too. If profit-minded companies will not build out networks there, who will? The American tax payer. Alternate solutions are welcome. ]]>

Posted in

7 Comments

  1. Mike Moreno on July 15, 2009 at 6:40 pm

    Safelink is welfare! Basically the US government is taking money from tax paying citizens and giving it to people in the form of cellphones instead of actual money. These same people could get by just fine with land line service. Furthermore, I called 1 800 Safelink and it took me to a customer service call center in INDIA!!! So my tax dollars now subsidize free cell phones and helps pay the wages of Indians, not US citizens. Brilliant!!!



  2. Nanny on August 13, 2009 at 2:55 pm

    I am a low income college student who had been having trouble paying for my cell phone bill each month. Safelink is a great idea because its not only for the unemployed…but for low income people! I am working, but I also have to pay for tuition and books…which makes my budget for my cell phone slim to none. I switched to TracFone not too long ago, and now I am going to apply for the Safelink plan.



  3. Annette on August 14, 2009 at 9:52 am

    What about the new Virgin mobile program? Little info but lots of chatting going on. They are offering a deal to low income people something like only $10 and I have to pay full price? Seems unfair. Am calling customer service and complaining. We should all get the same price!!



  4. Lindsay on November 12, 2009 at 11:23 pm

    Safelink provides a great opportunity for low-income customers! I just graduated from my community college and am currently jobless.. being eligible for this free phone has saved me a great deal as well as kept me connected with my family. Safelink has helped me to move forward a considerable amount!



  5. Jessica on February 28, 2010 at 9:36 pm

    Research is not hard “SafeLink phones are not paid for by taxpayers or the federal government. TracFone Wireless pays for the phones and also the cost of promoting its SafeLink program to make sure that eligible consumers know about the program.” https://www.safelinkwireless.com/EnrollmentPublic/benefits.aspx



  6. Scott LeBlanc on June 23, 2011 at 11:37 pm

    Mike I have been unemployed for almost 2 years now. That is after working 36+ years, paying my taxes, and my bills. The truth is that I have watched my credit scores of 700+, my savings, retirement, and possibly soon my home of 18 years vanish. Meanwhile my phone bill has gone from $67 four years ago to close to $200 and recently was shut-off after I paid only half the bill. That was after 20 years of being a faithful customer.
    I see things a bit differently than I did 2 years ago when I was ‘paying taxes’ and had an income like you. This isn’t welfare … it’s a right of every American and as soon as my situation changes I will give up the ‘freedom’ phone and be thankful rather than begrudging the next person that gets one to help them in a time of need!
    It’s a Global economy and we need to adjust *)



  7. john on January 2, 2014 at 2:11 am

    Since carriers won’t build out into the rural areas the only way it will get done is for each person to contribute to the universal phone fund. So that small tax you pay every month will help everybody because the nations cell tower network will offer more coverage wherever you roam in these United States. As for the poor people who qualify……I don’t have a problem with it because if others fall into that low income situation then they will be helped too. It’s a win win for the poor and for the whole cell tower network in general.